Skip to content

KUKA Robotics integration

KUKA robots and workflow management

KUKA manufactures industrial robots ranging from 6kg collaborative robots to 1300kg heavy-duty systems. While KUKA provides strong motion control and programming tools, managing procedures and documentation across robot fleets often requires additional workflow systems.

KUKA robot ecosystem overview

Current hardware platforms

KUKA’s lineup includes several robot families:

  • LBR iiwa: Collaborative 7-axis robots for sensitive assembly tasks
  • KR AGILUS: Light payload robots (6-10kg) for electronics and precision work
  • KR SCARA: High-precision robots (6-12kg) with 0.02mm accuracy
  • KR QUANTEC: Versatile robots with 120-300kg payload capacity
  • KR FORTEC: Heavy-duty robots handling 240-600kg
  • KR 1000 TITAN: Ultra-heavy robots up to 1300kg payload

Software and programming tools

iiQKA.OS2:

  • Web-based programming interface
  • Virtual robot controller for simulation
  • AI-ready architecture with optional NVIDIA expansion board
  • Compatible with existing KRL programs

KUKA.WorkVisual:

  • Offline programming and configuration
  • Field bus setup and I/O mapping
  • Virtual commissioning capabilities

SmartPAD 2.0:

  • Teach pendant for manual programming
  • Over 250,000 units currently deployed
  • Cable-connected for safety-rated operation

KUKA Robot Language (KRL):

  • Pascal-based programming language
  • Precise motion control optimized for KUKA hardware
  • Consists of .src (movement commands) and .dat (position data) file pairs

How KUKA programs are deployed

Traditional KRL programming approach

KUKA robots execute programs written in KRL, which requires two files with identical names:

  • .src file: Contains movement commands and logic
  • .dat file: Stores position data and variables

Programs are loaded onto robot controllers through several methods:

  1. USB transfer: Programs copied to USB drives and loaded via controller interface
  2. Network deployment: Transfer via Ethernet using KUKA.WorkVisual
  3. Teach pendant: Direct programming on the smartPAD device

Each robot controller stores programs locally in the KRC/R1/Programs directory.

Programming methods

Teach pendant programming: Manual guidance of robot through positions - time-intensive but doesn’t require external tools.

Offline programming: Create and test programs in simulation before deployment. KUKA.Sim enables virtual commissioning and validation.

Hand guiding: KUKA’s ready2_pilot system uses a 6D joystick for intuitive position teaching.

Text-based KRL: Direct code writing for programmers familiar with Pascal-like syntax.

Python integration: KUKA.PythonCore module enables Python-based programming alongside traditional KRL.

Integration protocols available

KUKA robots support standard industrial communication:

  • PROFINET: Industrial Ethernet protocol
  • EtherCAT: Real-time fieldbus system
  • OPC UA: Machine-to-machine communication standard
  • KUKA.PLC mxAutomation: Direct control from Siemens and Rockwell PLCs

Workflow management gaps

Challenges in multi-robot deployments

When managing multiple KUKA robots, common operational challenges include:

Program version control: Each robot may run different versions of the same program, making standardization difficult.

Procedure documentation: Robot execution data (coordinates, timestamps) doesn’t automatically link to standard operating procedures or work instructions.

Knowledge sharing: Optimizations discovered on one robot require manual propagation to other units.

Audit trails: Connecting robot actions to compliance requirements and quality documentation requires separate systems.

Dynamic updates: Changing procedures across a robot fleet involves updating programs on each controller individually.

Potential Tallyfy integration approach

Tallyfy could serve as a workflow layer above KUKA’s motion control system, addressing documentation and procedure management.

Integration architecture concept

Diagram

What Tallyfy could provide

Procedure documentation: Link robot tasks to documented SOPs and work instructions.

Process tracking: Monitor which procedures each robot executes and when.

Audit trails: Maintain compliance records connecting robot actions to quality requirements.

Fleet visibility: Dashboard showing all robots and their current process status.

Knowledge base: Central repository for procedures accessible across all robots.

Integration requirements

Technical prerequisites for integration:

  • KUKA robots with KRC2, KRC4, or KRC5 controllers
  • Network connectivity (Ethernet required)
  • OPC UA or KUKA.Connect for data exchange
  • Middleware to translate between KUKA protocols and Tallyfy API
  • Tallyfy organization with API access enabled

Implementation considerations

Assessment phase

Before implementing workflow integration:

  1. Document current KRL programs and associated procedures
  2. Identify which processes require audit trails or compliance tracking
  3. Evaluate network infrastructure for robot connectivity
  4. Determine integration points between KUKA controllers and external systems

Technical integration options

Option 1: Read-only monitoring - Track robot status and link to Tallyfy processes without modifying robot programs.

Option 2: Bidirectional integration - Robot reports completion status; Tallyfy provides procedure parameters.

Option 3: Full workflow control - Tallyfy initiates robot programs based on process triggers.

Cost and timeline

Integration complexity varies based on approach:

  • Read-only monitoring: Lower complexity, faster deployment
  • Bidirectional integration: Moderate complexity, requires middleware development
  • Full workflow control: Higher complexity, extensive testing required

KUKA robots represent significant capital investment. Workflow management integration is a smaller incremental cost focused on operational efficiency.

Technical requirements summary

For workflow integration with KUKA robots:

  • Controllers: KRC2, KRC4, or KRC5
  • Connectivity: Ethernet network access
  • Protocols: OPC UA or KUKA.Connect preferred
  • Middleware: Custom or third-party integration layer
  • Tallyfy access: API-enabled organization

Integrations > Robotics

This section explores robotics workflow management challenges including communication protocols like OPC UA and ROS integration architecture security requirements human-robot collaboration patterns safety compliance technical readiness organizational considerations and industry applications across manufacturing logistics healthcare and food sectors while addressing protocol complexity network security latency sensitivity and legacy system limitations.

Robotics > Universal Robots integration

Universal Robots cobots execute static pre-programmed routines stored locally on controllers which creates significant challenges for enterprise workflow management including no dynamic knowledge lookup between robots and isolated program libraries that prevent cross-fleet learning and optimization propagation while lacking the procedural compliance documentation and audit trails needed for regulated industries.

Robotics > Unitree Robotics integration

Unitree Robotics manufactures quadruped and humanoid robots with SDKs for movement control across industrial inspection and research applications but lacks operational workflow management capabilities that a potential Tallyfy integration could address through dynamic procedure querying and centralized fleet knowledge sharing with compliance documentation.

Robotics > AppTronik Apollo integration

AppTronik’s Apollo humanoid robot designed for industrial applications currently in pilot programs with Mercedes-Benz and GXO Logistics could benefit from Tallyfy integration to address workflow management gaps including static task programming limitations where robots stop for manual updates when encountering new scenarios and individual robot configuration challenges where optimizations don’t propagate across fleets along with manual compliance documentation needs that Tallyfy could solve through centralized procedure management automatic audit trails and fleet-wide coordination via