n8n vs other middleware platforms
Picking the right middleware platform can make or break your Tallyfy integrations. Your choice affects everything - automation power, monthly costs, and how much control you have. Let’s compare n8n with other popular platforms to help you decide.
Feature | n8n | Zapier | Make | Power Automate |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pricing model | Per workflow execution | Per task/operation | Per operation | Per user/flow run |
Self-hosting | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
Visual builder | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Code flexibility | ✅ Full JS/Python | ⚠️ Limited | ⚠️ Limited | ⚠️ Limited |
Tallyfy connector | ❌ Use HTTP | ✅ Native | ❌ Use HTTP | ✅ Native |
Learning curve | Medium | Easy | Medium | Medium-Hard |
Error handling | ✅ Advanced | ⚠️ Basic | ✅ Good | ✅ Good |
Free tier | ✅ Self-host unlimited | ⚠️ 100 tasks/month | ⚠️ 1000 ops/month | ⚠️ 750 runs/month |
Cost efficiency at scale: Here’s the thing - n8n charges per workflow execution, not per operation. Check 100 Tallyfy tasks? That’s one execution in n8n. Other platforms? That’s 100 operations. You do the math.
Data privacy and compliance: Self-hosting n8n means your Tallyfy data stays on your servers. Period. For organizations with strict compliance requirements, this is non-negotiable.
Developer-friendly features:
- Write custom JavaScript or Python code within workflows
- Debug with step-by-step execution viewer
- Version control integration for workflow definitions
- API-first design matches Tallyfy’s approach
No vendor lock-in: Export workflows as JSON. Switch instances. Modify programmatically. Your workflows, your control.
Choose n8n when you have:
- High-volume integrations: Processing hundreds of Tallyfy tasks or launching dozens of processes daily
- Complex data transformations: Need to reshape data between Tallyfy and other systems
- Security requirements: Integration data can’t leave your servers
- Technical resources: Your team can handle basic API concepts
- Budget constraints: Can’t afford per-operation pricing that adds up fast
Choose Zapier when:
- You need something up and running in 5 minutes
- You’re only connecting a few simple workflows
- You prefer native Tallyfy connector over API configuration
- Budget isn’t a primary concern for low-volume use
Choose Make when:
- You need visual data mapping tools
- You want a balance between ease and power
- You’re building moderately complex multi-step workflows
- You prefer cloud-only solutions
Choose Power Automate when:
- Your organization already uses Microsoft 365 everywhere
- You need desktop automation alongside web integrations
- You want to leverage Microsoft’s AI Builder
- You have Power Platform licenses already
Let’s get specific with a real scenario:
Scenario: Daily sync of 50 Tallyfy processes, each with 10 tasks to check and potentially update across your CRM and project management tools.
Platform | Monthly operations | Monthly cost |
---|---|---|
n8n Self-hosted | Unlimited | $0 (hosting only) |
n8n Cloud | 30 executions | ~$20 |
Zapier | 15,000 tasks | ~$239 |
Make | 15,000 operations | ~$59 |
Power Automate | 15,000 runs | ~$150 |
Simple integration (Launch process from form):
- Zapier: 5 minutes with native connector
- n8n: 10 minutes with HTTP Request node
- Make: 10 minutes with HTTP module
- Power Automate: 8 minutes with connector
Complex integration (Multi-system data collection before process launch):
- Zapier: Gets messy with linear flow - you’ll need multiple zaps
- n8n: Full control with branching, loops, and custom code
- Make: Good visual tools but limited code options
- Power Automate: Capable but complex interface
Debugging and monitoring:
- n8n: Excellent execution history with full data visibility
- Zapier: Basic task history
- Make: Good execution logs with data flow visualization
- Power Automate: Detailed run history with analytics
Team collaboration:
- n8n: Self-hosted requires own user management
- Zapier: Built-in team features with permissions
- Make: Team workspaces with role management
- Power Automate: Integrated with Microsoft 365 permissions
Webhook handling:
- n8n: Unlimited webhooks with any plan
- Zapier: Webhooks on paid plans only
- Make: Webhooks available on all plans
- Power Automate: Full webhook support
Thinking about switching to n8n? Here’s what you’re looking at:
- Workflow recreation: Can’t import directly, but n8n’s flexibility often makes complex workarounds simpler
- Credential setup: One-time configuration of HTTP Request credentials for Tallyfy
- Testing period: Run both platforms side-by-side for a week or two
- Training needs: Your team needs basic API understanding (nothing crazy)
Some organizations use multiple platforms:
- Zapier for simple, non-technical team workflows
- n8n for complex, high-volume, or sensitive integrations
- Power Automate for Microsoft-specific connections
Smart move? Sometimes.
Consider these factors:
- Volume: Processing tons of tasks? n8n’s execution-based pricing wins
- Complexity: Need complex logic? n8n’s code support makes it manageable
- Security: Must self-host? That’s n8n
- Team skills: Not technical? Zapier might be easier
- Existing tools: Already in Microsoft’s ecosystem? Power Automate fits naturally
- Budget: For most scenarios, n8n gives you the best bang for your buck
With n8n’s HTTP Request node connecting directly to Tallyfy’s Open API, you’re never stuck waiting for connector updates. Growing fast? n8n grows with you.
Middleware > Integration platforms with Tallyfy
Integrations > Choosing the right integration approach
- 2025 Tallyfy, Inc.
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Use
- Report Issue
- Trademarks