Choosing the right integration approach

How do I choose between API, middleware, and AI for Tallyfy integrations?

Tallyfy offers three distinct integration approaches - direct API, middleware platforms, and AI-powered code generation. Choose based on your technical capabilities, timeline, and long-term maintenance preferences.

Each approach has specific advantages depending on your organization’s needs. Direct API provides maximum control, middleware offers visual workflows without coding, and AI accelerates custom development by generating integration code automatically.

When should I use direct API integration?

Choose direct API when you have:

• In-house development team with API experience
• Need for maximum performance and customization
• Complex business logic requirements
• Budget for ongoing code maintenance

Direct API is ideal for:

• Building custom applications that embed Tallyfy workflows
• High-volume automated process launches (1000+ per day)
• Complex data transformations before sending to Tallyfy
• Mission-critical integrations requiring millisecond response times

Example scenario: A software company integrates their customer onboarding system to automatically create Tallyfy processes for each new enterprise client, with custom logic based on contract type and service level.

Learn more about API integration →

When should I use middleware platforms?

Choose middleware when you have:

• Limited or no coding resources
• Need to connect multiple systems quickly
• Preference for visual workflow builders
• Standard integration patterns (not highly custom)

Popular middleware options:

• Zapier: Visual scenarios with advanced data manipulation
• n8n: Self-hosted option for data privacy requirements
• Power Automate: Ideal for Microsoft ecosystem integration

Example scenario: An HR department uses middleware to automatically create employee onboarding processes in Tallyfy whenever a new hire is added to their HRIS system.

When should I use AI-powered code generation?

Choose AI code generation when you have:

• Developers who want to accelerate integration development
• Clear requirements but limited time to write code
• Need for custom integration logic beyond middleware capabilities
• Preference for maintainable, documented code

AI code generation advantages:

• Generates working integration code in minutes instead of days
• Creates proper error handling and logging automatically
• Produces well-documented code that developers can modify
• Supports multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, etc.)

How it works:

1. Describe your integration requirements to Claude or ChatGPT
2. AI generates complete integration code with Tallyfy API calls
3. Developer reviews, tests, and deploys the code
4. Maintain and enhance the code as needed

Example scenario: A logistics company uses Claude to generate Python code that monitors their warehouse management system and creates Tallyfy shipping processes with complex conditional logic based on order characteristics.

Pro tip: Start with AI, refine with developers

Many organizations use AI to generate the initial integration code, then have their developers customize it for specific business requirements. This hybrid approach can reduce development time by 70-80%.

Integration approach comparison matrix

Factor	Direct API	Middleware	AI Code Generation
Technical skill required	High (developers)	Low (no-code)	Medium (review code)
Setup time	Days to weeks	Hours to days	Hours to days
Customization level	Unlimited	Limited by platform	High
Ongoing maintenance	Code updates needed	Platform manages	Code updates needed
Cost	Development time	Monthly subscription	AI tool + dev time
Performance	Fastest	Good	Fast
Best for	Complex, high-volume	Standard workflows	Custom but quick

How do I decide which approach is right for me?

Ask yourself these questions:

1. Do you have developers available?

   • Yes → Consider API or AI generation
   • No → Use middleware

2. Is this a one-time setup or ongoing project?

   • One-time → AI generation might be fastest
   • Ongoing → Consider maintenance requirements

3. How complex is your integration?

   • Simple (if-this-then-that) → Middleware
   • Complex logic → API or AI-generated code

4. What’s your timeline?

   • Need it this week → Middleware or AI
   • Have a month → Direct API for maximum control

Can I combine multiple approaches?

Yes! Many organizations use hybrid approaches:

• Middleware + API: Use middleware for simple automations while building custom API integrations for complex workflows
• AI + Middleware: Generate custom webhook endpoints with AI, then connect them via middleware
• Phased approach: Start with middleware for quick wins, then migrate critical integrations to API

Migration is always possible

Starting with one approach doesn’t lock you in. Many customers begin with middleware for rapid deployment, then selectively migrate high-volume or complex integrations to direct API as their needs evolve.

Related articles

Pro > Integrations

Tallyfy transforms from an isolated workflow tool into a comprehensive business process orchestration hub through multiple integration methods including Open API for custom development webhooks for real-time notifications middleware platforms for no-code connections AI agents for legacy systems and native integrations that coordinate across entire technology ecosystems for maximum organizational efficiency.

Integrations > Middleware

Middleware platforms like Zapier Make and Power Automate enable non-technical users to automatically connect Tallyfy with other business applications through visual drag-and-drop interfaces without requiring any coding expertise.

N8N > n8n vs other middleware platforms

Compare n8n with Zapier Make Power Automate and other middleware platforms for Tallyfy integration focusing on features pricing flexibility and use cases.

Middleware > Why use an integration platform (middleware) with Tallyfy

Integration platforms provide ready-made connections error handling and monitoring tools to easily connect Tallyfy with other business software without needing custom code development.