Best organizational structure examples

Discover how organizational structure impacts success. Learn 5 key types and choose the best for your business.

Organizational structure determines how work flows between people and departments. Here is how we help teams manage workflows across any structure.

Solution Workflow & Process
Workflow Management Software

Workflow Made Easy

Save Time
Track & Delegate Workflows
Consistent Workflows
Explore this solution

Summary

  • Fuzzy structure creates predictable chaos - Without formal organizational structure, tasks either don’t happen (everyone assumes someone else is responsible) or get duplicated (everyone thinks it’s their job), people step on toes, information fails to reach the right people, and top management drowns in approval requests
  • Line structure trades simplicity for rigidity - The traditional hierarchy where each tier only communicates with immediate superiors works for businesses with rigid routines and small teams, but one hand doesn’t know what the other is doing since there’s no horizontal collaboration
  • Project-based structures assemble best-fit teams dynamically - When work differs client to client, directors appoint project leaders and assign specialized employees as needed, then reassign everyone when projects finish, though teams must constantly adapt to new colleagues and managers
  • Matrix structure creates dual reporting with two bosses - Hybrid approach combines functional departments with project teams where specialists report to both their functional manager (ensuring company standards) and project leader (ensuring completion), which can work but presents coordination challenges. Need help clarifying your organizational structure?

Organizational Structure: do you even need to formalize it when you have a relatively small business? From what I’ve seen helping teams implement workflows at Tallyfy - with professional services and manufacturing being among the most common industries we work with - the answer to that question is a straightforward “Yes.”

Your Organizational Structure not only captures who is responsible for what but also the reporting and communications lines that tie everything together. To give you a better idea on the “why” we are going to go through 5 of the most popular organizational structures & explain how each works.

Bear this in mind, though. If organizational structure is not clear, there are consequences for your business. Here are some of the things that can go wrong if your organizational structure is fuzzy:

  • Something isn’t going to happen because everyone thinks someone else is responsible.
  • It will get duplicated because everyone thinks it’s part of their job.
  • People are going to get mad and frustrated because they don’t know what to do or are treading on each other’s toes.
  • Information fails to flow via the most efficient channel or reach the right people.
  • The business cannot do a single thing without referring to top management who then slowly go crazy because of the workload.

If you’re nodding your head because some of these things are already happening in your business, you’re nearly ready to begin working on your formal structure. Use these organizational structure examples to choose the one that works best for your business.

Line organizational structure

BPMN 2.0 organizational hierarchy flowchart with CEO, Directors, Managers, and Employees This is the most traditional of the organizational structures that businesses use. There is an executive at the top of the heap, people responsible for each area (the director tier is for bigger businesses), and teams of people who do the work in each department.

The advantage of this type of organizational structure lies in its simplicity. The disadvantage probably lies in its rigidity and the length of time needed for information to flow through the organization. Everyone just gets on with the allocated task.

If you look at the lines in the diagram, you will see that each tier only takes instructions from, and communicates with, its immediate superior. There’s no collaboration going on here. As the saying goes, “One hand doesn’t know what the other is doing.” Since there’s no horizontal communication going on, the “big boss” has to coordinate everything.

Having said that, this type of organizational structure could work for businesses who work according to a rigid routine, collaborate informally, and don’t employ many people.

Functional organizational structure

BPMN 2.0 organizational hierarchy chart showing CEO, Directors, Managers, and Employees in hierarchical structure As you can see, this structure is very similar to the traditional line structure, but there are far more lines of communication. In this organizational structure example, we can see that although both directors have people over whom they have direct authority, they can also send information to managers they do not directly control.

The same is true of the managers’ relationship with teams. The purchasing department may want the financial manager to pay an authorized supplier. No problem.

The team member goes straight to the financial manager. A team leader in production needs help from the HR manager, or HR wants to task the production team leader with something.

There is a direct line of communication open. Communication is vital to the successful implementation of this organizational structure example.

Line and staff organizational structure

Organizational hierarchy chart showing CEO at top with directors, managers and employees in tree structure To understand this structure, we first need to understand what “staff” means in this context. Staff members are advisors.

They provide technical information, advice, and opinions. They may be able to authorize certain activities, and they might compile reports that help with decision-making. This type of organizational structure works best for companies in specialist fields. It’s typical of businesses who need experts in knowledge areas like engineering, sciences, law, or insurance.

Project-based structure

Organizational chart showing Director at top with three project managers below, each managing analysts, architects, developers, and testers If your business engages in projects that differ from client to client and from project brief to project brief, being able to assemble the right team for the job is helpful.

This organizational structure example changes all the time. Constant adaptation is required. The director appoints a leader for every project and makes people who have the necessary expertise part of the team. When the project finishes, team leaders and managers are assigned to new projects.

You will choose this type of organizational structure if your business takes on projects that require teams of specialized employees and lots of collaboration. The big advantage is that you can always choose the best team for any particular project. Mix and match teams as necessary.

The drawbacks? Teams must adapt to a new set of colleagues, and sometimes a new manager, every time they tackle a new task. The manager has to be an all-rounder, controlling all the traditional management functions of finance, marketing, HR, operations, and so on. One way around this is to have a functional structure that serves all the project leaders in the project-based structure. In our conversations with operations leaders at professional services firms, we have heard that the biggest challenge is ensuring recurring daily task management with automatic hand-offs between departments - without clear workflows, team accountability suffers and progress tracking becomes impossible.

Example Procedure
Decision making hierarchy
1Document the Decision Request
2Manager Review
3Senior Manager Escalation
4Executive or CEO Review
5Communicate and Record the Outcome
View template
Example Procedure
Employee Onboarding
1HR - Set up payroll and send welcome email
2IT - Order equipment and set up workstation
3Office Manager - Prepare physical workspace
4IT - Create accounts and system access
5HR - Welcome meeting and company orientation
+3 more steps
View template
Example Procedure
Employee Performance Review & Evaluation Workflow
1Schedule performance review meeting
2Define employee goals and development plan
3Create training and development plan
4Executive approval for senior manager evaluations
5Collect performance data and 360 feedback
+4 more steps
View template

Matrix structure

MarketingOperationsFinanceHRM
Marketing ManagerOperations ManagerFinance ManagerHR Manager
Project AMarketing Team (A)Operations Team (A)Finance Team (A)HR Team (A)
Project BMarketing Team (B)Operations Team (B)Finance Team (B)HR Team (B)
Project CMarketing Team (C)Operations Team (C)Finance Team (C)HR Team (C)
Project DMarketing Team (D)Operations Team (D)Finance Team (D)HR Team (D)

This hybrid organizational structure example tries to combine a functional organizational structure with a matrix-based one. In this instance, the business is also project-based, but the team follows a functional structure.

Each team leader is assigned a representative or team from each traditional functional area that would apply to the project and its team. This functional team member reports to the project leader as well as the functional manager in his or her area of specialization. That’s right; there are two “bosses.” It can work, but it can also present challenges.

The functional manager’s job is to see that employees and activities align with the company’s policies and standards. The team leader’s job is making sure that the team completes the project as planned. One digital strategy consulting firm we spoke with found that by forcing themselves to document their matrix structure’s processes clearly, they could ensure steps were not missed or done out of order - the COO noted there were “fewer mistakes” once everyone understood how the dual reporting relationships should work in practice.

Organizational structure examples: final thoughts

Each organizational structure has its pros and cons. In my experience working with companies of various sizes at Tallyfy - spanning industries from healthcare to technology - the trick is to find a form of organizational structure in which your business gets the most benefit from the pros and suffers least from the cons.

There are side-issues to consider too. For example, with the more traditional, pyramid-shaped structures, will your organization have a “flatter” pyramid or a taller, pointier one? Again, the answers depend on your business’s needs and activities.

About the Author

Amit is the CEO of Tallyfy. He is a workflow expert and specializes in process automation and the next generation of business process management in the post-flowchart age. He has decades of consulting experience in task and workflow automation, continuous improvement (all the flavors) and AI-driven workflows for small and large companies. Amit did a Computer Science degree at the University of Bath and moved from the UK to St. Louis, MO in 2014. He loves watching American robins and their nesting behaviors!

Follow Amit on his website, LinkedIn, Facebook, Reddit, X (Twitter) or YouTube.

Automate your workflows with Tallyfy

Stop chasing status updates. Track and automate your processes in one place.

Discover Tallyfy